Qualitative Dissertation Study Analysis LOCATE ANY QUALITATIVE Essay

Qualitative Dissertation Study Analysis LOCATE ANY QUALITATIVE DISSERTATION AND defer WITH ASSIGNMENT - Essay ExampleTwelve female season-ticket holders of university mens basketball, with no recent attendance at a womens basketball game, were interviewed expend a semi-structured format (Farrell, 2006, p. 1). The logic behind this selection of interview subjects was simple. If Farrell had analyzed women who do not like sports to determine why they do not curb womens sports, it would have led to too obvious a conclusion Women just do not like sports, women or mens. However, it does seem executable that women who like sports like mens sports, that there may be something about mens sports in particular that would attract them in particular, such that talking to either fans of womens sports or women who watch neither would be relevant as a control. Nonetheless, this choice of interview subject is designed to breakthrough people who not only like sports but also like them enough to buy a season-ticket pass to college games. Farrell (2006) pointed to look that identifies four different categories of research interest characteristics of linguistic process, discovery of regularities, discerning meaning, and reflection. She also pointed out that qualitative and quantitative techniques be not strict binaries. For example, one quantitative technique, numerical and statistical analysis, is do on a fundamentally qualitative tool, a survey, by having people rank their beliefs from 1 to 7 or on any other scale. Farrell defined qualitative research, in line with Golafshani (2003), as a naturalistic approach that seeks to understand phenomena in context-specific puts, such as a real world setting where the researcher does not attempt to manipulate the phenomenon of interest (p. 61). Theoretical Background Farrell (2006) used social constructivism and critical theory for her interpretation, noting that many other approaches (positivism, pragmatism, interpretivism, po stmodern techniques) are also equally viable. She defined social constructivism thusly Social constructivism asserts that humans construct knowledge using collective social instruments such as language and cultural practices (p. 62). A social constructivist argument would take it as a given that the category of women is not fixed, so there is no answer for wherefore dont women like womens sports? that has the form Because that is what women do or Women are genetically programmed only to like male gladiatorial rituals. If women do not like womens sports, it must be a social factor acculturation, values, the failure of womens sports to appeal to their values or interests, etc. Farrell (2006) justified her use of critical theory thusly The champaign of women in sport is, in essence, a study of gender struggles against male hegemonic values embedded in the manifestation of sport as a male preserve. Critical theory lends itself well to a more deliberate investigation of the power stru ctures of sport in this study (p. 63). Indeed, critical theory