It’s Immoral to Ban Human Cloning :: Argumentative Persuasive Argument Essays

Its Immoral to Ban Human Cloning The Bush administration has declared itself unequivocally opposed to human cloning, whether for stem-cell research or reproduction. The moral and ethical issues posed by human cloning are profound and can non be unheeded in the quest for scientific discovery.The premise here is apparent until a scientist can satisfy the religiously minded, the scientist cannot proceed. Science functions by permission of religion. On this premise, we would not have anesthesia, birth control, or, arguably, the wheel.In a free society, the principle is not ban everything, then allow a few besidesions. Rather, the government cannot ban anything except acts that violate individual rights.But whose rights would be violated by human cloning?If the cloning is used for research, the product is a microscopic group of cells. unmatched could argue about the status of a fetus in the late stages of pregnancy, but there are no rational grounds for ascribing rights to a thumping of cells in a Petri dish.If the cloning is used for reproduction, the result is a baby who exactly resembles, physically, someone else. Again, whose rights would that violate? If no ones, what is the justification for government even to determine stepping in to ban it?If you were cloned today, nine months from now a woman would give birth to a baby with your genetic endowment. The cloned baby would be your identical twin, retard a times.Twins of the same age do not frighten us, so why should a twin separated by a generation? Some fear the specter of mass cloning of one individual, especially cloning of sadistic monsters, as in The Boys from Brazil, Ira Levins nightmarish projection of cadres of newborn Hitlers spawned from the dictators genes.The error here is philosophical equating a person with his body. A persons essential self is his mind--that in him which thinks, values, and chooses. It is ones mind, not ones genes, that governs who one is. Man is the rational animal. One s elementary choice is to think or not to think, in Ayn Rands phrase, and the conclusions, values, and character of individuals depend upon the extent and rationality of their thinking.Genes provide the readiness to reason, but the exercise and guidance of that capacity is up to each individual, from the birth of his reasoning mind in infancy through the rest of his life.Neither genes nor environment can implant ideas in a childs mind and make him accept them.